Steven Githens wrote: > > I don't see why you couldn't easily plug FCKEditor in as an > > alternative. We can walk you through the process if you're interested > I've been thinking about this too and wanted to vote+=1. I know TinyMCE > is better and being used in all the research for next generation Fluid > and Sakai stuff, but I think we'll definately need it to not be super > difficult to use this with other Rich Text Editors. ( I think a little > difficult would be ok ;) )
We will make it easy to work with everything. > In addition to Lovemore, I know at least a few other groups that are > doing this same thing manually and would probably love to use the Fluid > one as soon as it's ready. For any medium timeline deliverable that > needs to get dropped into Sakai 2.5 or 2.6 and look like the rest of the > system, there is a strong likelyhood it will need to be able to use FCK. > > Also, I don't how easy it is to swap implementations across the system > in Moodle (probably a bit easier than Sakai), but their default is > typically HTMLArea, so I imagine they would need to the ability to use > that too in order to match the rest of the system. > > Mega cheers, > Steve _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
