I'm way behind here, but I have a paranoid question (caveat: I have not played with this code)...
How does this start/stop rich text editing play with loading times / memory issues? I'm generally aware of some nasty non-cleanup stuff with these editors (leaving script objects and markup hanging around), especially as iframes navigate around, especially in IE. Is there anything to worry about here? Thanks, -Noah On Nov 17, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Steven Githens wrote: > Hi Again, > > Just had a go playing around with the TinyMCE and FCK versions of the > Inline Editor from Fluid Trunk. The FCK one works great as well > and I'm > excited about it being a good transition for existing Sakai > Deployments > that have customized FCK Plugins and it just generally being used > in all > the tools. > > Will these be in Fluid 0.6, or not until 0.7 ? > > Thanks, > Steve G > > Antranig Basman wrote: >> Steven Githens wrote: >> >> >>>> I don't see why you couldn't easily plug FCKEditor in as an >>>> alternative. We can walk you through the process if you're >>>> interested >>>> >>> I've been thinking about this too and wanted to vote+=1. I know >>> TinyMCE >>> is better and being used in all the research for next generation >>> Fluid >>> and Sakai stuff, but I think we'll definately need it to not be >>> super >>> difficult to use this with other Rich Text Editors. ( I think a >>> little >>> difficult would be ok ;) ) >>> >> >> We will make it easy to work with everything. >> >> >>> In addition to Lovemore, I know at least a few other groups that are >>> doing this same thing manually and would probably love to use the >>> Fluid >>> one as soon as it's ready. For any medium timeline deliverable that >>> needs to get dropped into Sakai 2.5 or 2.6 and look like the rest >>> of the >>> system, there is a strong likelyhood it will need to be able to >>> use FCK. >>> >>> Also, I don't how easy it is to swap implementations across the >>> system >>> in Moodle (probably a bit easier than Sakai), but their default is >>> typically HTMLArea, so I imagine they would need to the ability >>> to use >>> that too in order to match the rest of the system. >>> >>> Mega cheers, >>> Steve >>> > > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work > > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
