Good point Colin. I think we can express the distinction in the
handbook in a way that clarifies the use of the different techniques and
puts them in the proper perspective.
Thanks,
Ppaul
Colin Clark wrote:
Hey,
On 27-Feb-09, at 2:53 PM, Allison Bloodworth wrote:
... As the Fluid UX Walkthroughs also include an HTML code review
(for accessibility), we could consider making that its own page as
well. There may be versions of these pages as children under:
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/UX+Walkthrough+Protocols+and+Checklists,
but I think they would need some updating--it appears they may just
be the parts of the parent page.
One minor clarification: there are actually two different types of
accessibility walkthroughs. The simple protocol is designed for
non-techies and is intended to be done during the flow of a UX
Walkthrough. No code review required.
The comprehensive protocol requires an under-the-covers review of
markup and the use of assistive technologies and other tools to
verify. Not necessarily intended for all users, but very detailed.
We'll probably want to distinguish between the two and how they should
be used. Since we don't want accessibility walkthroughs to be
forgotten, we may want to highlight the simple protocol and suggest
that they be done as part of the wholistic walkthrough process.
Colin
---
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
