Hey Justin, Thanks for putting this all out there. I’m curious about Proposal 1 — can you say more about what the implications are, why you’re recommending this, and break down what it means (pros and cons)?
Thinking aloud basically… Jess On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote: > We've made it through and tagged Infusion 1.5 today. The official > announcement will follow after the documentation work has been completed. > > However, we are now open to start working on the next release (Infusion 2.0). > The first two issues we should tackle are as follows. > > Updating the version number > http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5449 > > Moving the demos and tests to be siblings of src > http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5217 > > I'd also like to make the following two proposals related to testing and jira > cleanup. > > Proposal 1: > > For Infusion 2.0 and beyond I propose we only test with the latest versions > of Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari. This will be a slight > departure from the support we had for Infusion 1.5 where we supported IE 8, > 9, 10 & 11. > > > Proposal 2: > > After every release there is a lot of jira cleanup needed. I'd like to take > the opportunity to close ("won't fix") all issues related to deprecated > features, apis, and etc., as well as those that are specific to browsers we > are no longer tracking. > > Please let me know ASAP, as we'd like to start in on the jira clean up right > away. > > Thanks > Justin > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
