Before I sign this I'd like to ask if you believe those are really the issues holding up graduation. I'm not sure either is required, but if the PPMC wants to wait for those items that is ok.
I would suggest adding comments about how diverse the community is, both in terms of commits and activity on the mailing lists. Also, we've had some healthy discussions about changes to the RTC policy and other discussions that show a healthy community. That is definitely worth mentioning. Also, the fact that the team is not very reliant on its mentors is a very good sign. The fact that you have consistently created the reports without even being reminded (other than the automated messages) is a very good sign to me, although that isn't something you should include in the report. As you may be aware the incubator chair recently changed. Jukka is being very proactive in asking what the podlings need and to be specific about what steps need to be taken for graduation. Ralph On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have created the board report due for March at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Flume+Incubator+Status+Report+-+March+2012 > > Can the mentors please review it and sign off? If anything needs to > change, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Arvind Prabhakar
