Hi Ralph, On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Before I sign this I'd like to ask if you believe those are really the issues > holding up graduation. I'm not sure either is required, but if the PPMC wants > to wait for those items that is ok.
Even though these are not stated requirements/policy, I recently went through a lot of hassle for the graduation of another project (Sqoop). Given this experience, I feel that it is not worth taking a risk on this issue. I intend to sign up as a release manager for the next release and drive it at the earliest for this purpose. > > I would suggest adding comments about how diverse the community is, both in > terms of commits and activity on the mailing lists. Also, we've had some > healthy discussions about changes to the RTC policy and other discussions > that show a healthy community. That is definitely worth mentioning. Also, the > fact that the team is not very reliant on its mentors is a very good sign. > The fact that you have consistently created the reports without even being > reminded (other than the automated messages) is a very good sign to me, > although that isn't something you should include in the report. > Thanks. I will make a mention of the healthy community activities for Flume. > As you may be aware the incubator chair recently changed. Jukka is being very > proactive in asking what the podlings need and to be specific about what > steps need to be taken for graduation. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have created the board report due for March at: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Flume+Incubator+Status+Report+-+March+2012 >> >> Can the mentors please review it and sign off? If anything needs to >> change, please let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> Arvind Prabhakar
