See also: <http://filemaker.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/6994/kw/ipv6>
Winfried Am 2010-05-03 um 01:03 schrieb Winfried Huslik: > Richard, > > IPv6 has nothing to do with the file format .fp7, and it is not to expect > that the file format will be changed in the foreseeable future as it is so > flexible as to be capable to handle all future additions. > > > Chuck, > > That "litany" is for tech people, and it offers solutions and work arounds > for almost all cases, including IPv6 as to use a name server instead of a > hard coded IPv6 address. > > I recommend to read the technical specifications for FileMaker Server which > allows up to 250 simultaneous connections. The number of databases seems to > be limited only by available memory (50 should be OK). > > > Winfried > www.fmdiff.com > > > > Am 2010-05-02 um 22:34 schrieb richardsrussell tds.net: > >> = = = = = = >> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Chuck Pelto <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That's QUITE a litany of issues. >> >> I'm surprised at the lack of support for iPv6. That's been around for quite >> some time and although it is not as widely accepted as I think it SHOULD be, >> I would have thought FMI would be more proactive. Oh....wait....I'd >> forgotten about all the thinks they should have added back in FMP3 >> days.....<heavy sigh>.... >> >> = = = = = = >> Richard observes: >> >> I have no inside technical knowledge, so I'll let somebody who does give a >> definitive answer to this, but it's possible that FMI would have had to >> fiddle with the basic ".FP7" file format to include IP6 compatibility. I for >> one am delighted that they've been able to make ".FP7" last as long as they >> have, and it would take a lot more than IP6 compatibility to make me want to >> have to deal with a new file format.
