On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:56:47 +0000, Tom Elliott <[email protected]> wrote:
>Jason > >In retrospect I think I should perhaps have should have worded my disclaimer more along the lines of "I haven't bothered to read the question properly". > >In my haste, I read the requirement to be to split the digit strings into groups of two with any odd one being added to the final group - I believe the calc I posted does that (but I'm not rescinding my original disclaimer, just in case). > >As always, your eye and mind have proved to be more sensitive than mine > >cheers > >Tom Well, I was not very clear either. I said 'an additional' outcome, where it should be a 'different'. The power in charge doesn't need, apparently, the xx-xx-x anymore. So, Tom, your reading of 'split the digit strings into groups of two with any odd one being added to the final group', is correct. In Kindness JW
