On 1/1/13 3:18 PM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
On opposite end of spectrum you have piece of haskell code where
everything is abstracted and each abstraction is wrong in some way or
another. Main reason of later is functional fixedness. A haskell
programmer will see a structure as a monad but then does not see more
apropriate abstractions. This is mainly problematic when there are
portions of code that are very similar but only by chance and each
requires different treatment. You merge them into one function and
after some time this function ends with ten parameters.
Hmm, yeah. I've done that, but I've also recognized it and undone it,
or added parameters to types and/or reworked the combinators to deal
with both treatments. That one is even looking for combinators seems to
me to show that the Haskell programmer is inclined to resist functional
fixedness...
Marcus
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
