I.e.: given new code is checked in When code coverage is complete And all tests succeed Then deploy to integration On Feb 15, 2013 3:30 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could one analyze the test code (not the main source code) assuming it is > complete enough and make a determination? That is, the style of testing > determines how good the main code is. Is there behavior driven development > for behavior driven development? > On Feb 15, 2013 2:04 PM, "shaun gilchrist" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It seems this is not possible without a fitness function. A declarative >> approach to defining the "what" of your program would probably go some way >> towards making the validation of the "how" possible. BDD (behavior driven >> development) is the closest approach I have found to this - however the >> silver bullet of automatic validation from your declared behaviors is far >> from having been found. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I guess what I am asking for is a critic service. For both POLs and >>> uses of POLs. Can POLs be designed such that uses of POLs ensure good >>> design? Good architecture? I am way beyond my technical knowledge here. >>> On Feb 15, 2013 1:19 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I know of a few sites/tools which critcise your wesite...is there one >>>> for css? >>>> On Feb 15, 2013 1:02 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry we got into a big discussion about the web. I really want to >>>>> discuss POLs for rules, css being one of them. And in particular, once we >>>>> have a good POL, how to test it, and author with it--how to create a great >>>>> POL program? >>>>> > >>>>> > But what about probablistic rules? Can we design an ultimate >>>>> website w/o a designer? Can we use statistics to create a great solitaire >>>>> player--i have a pretty good stochastic solitaire player for one version >>>>> of >>>>> solitaire...how about others? How does one create a great set of rules? >>>>> One can create great rule POLs, but where are the authors? Something like >>>>> cameron browne's thesis seems great for grid games. He is quite prolific. >>>>> Can we apply the same logic to card games? Web sites? We have "The Nature >>>>> of Order" by c. Alexander. Are there nile designers or fuzz >>>>> testers/genetic algorithms for nile? >>>>> > Is fuzz testing a by product of nile design...should it be? >>>>> > >>>>> > If you want to check out the state of the art for dungeons and >>>>> dragons POLs check out fantasy grounds...xml hell. We can do better. >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fonc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >>
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
