I've heavily abridged your message David; sorry if I've dropped important 
context. My words below...

On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:04 PM, David Barbour <dmbarb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Even better if the languages are good for exploration by genetic programming 
> - i.e. easily sliced, spliced, rearranged, mutated.

I've only seen this done with two languages. Certainly it's possible in any 
language with the right "semantic chops" but so far it seems like we're looking 
at Lisp (et al) and FORTH. 

My observation has been that the main quality that yields (ease of 
recombination? I don't even know what it is for sure) is "syntaxlessness."

I'd love to know about other languages and qualities of languages that are 
conducive to this sort of thing, especially if anyone has seen interesting work 
done with one of the logic languages.
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to