I looked at the freetype/freetype2 FAQ's and some of the fonts, render @xfree86.org archives... and I'm betting this has been explained before... but here it goes -
Long story short... I was just compiling KDE3 CVS and ran across a <freetype/ftsnames.h> complaint - so I did something like the following to move along - mv /usr/include/freetype /usr/include/freetype_old ln -s /usr/X11R6/include/freetype2/freetype /usr/include/freetype So... it wasn't a big deal to work around the freetype/freetype2 thing - but I was curious if the freetype2 includes should have really looked like <freetype2/ftsnames.h> and/or the corresponding freetype/freetype2 includes can or should be /usr/include/freetype, /usr/include/freetype2 (or other equivalent locations and/or symlinks) I suppose the short answer may be... the developer (kfontinst) should've used <freetype2/*> instead of <freetype/*> - Jason _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
