MK> They have added a very large number of new glyph names, but they did not
MK> change the mapping of their private-use-area characters that have been
MK> added to Unicode in the mean time.
They have in a few cases. Check for instance the Zapf Dingbats mapping.
MK> The format of the file has changed!
It's now a one-to-many mapping, which may require changes to data
structures (Cedilla 0.3 will cons very slightly more than the previous
version).
In cases where a codepoint has multiple names, there's no indication
which is the preferred one. Font editors, for example, will need to
make an arbitrary choice.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
