--- Struan Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If so might I request a small departure from the XSL:FO spec, if it is
> straight-forward to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
>
I don't think deviations from the XSL:FO spec are either wise or going to
be popular.
Alex
=====
Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source Consultancy in London
OpenWeb Analysts Ltd, http://www.OWAL.co.uk/
DR WHO COMPETITION:
http://www.diversebooks.com/cgi-bin/caption/captions.cgi?date=200104
Get Your XML T-Shirt <t-shirt/> at http://www.inversity.co.uk/
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
