Re: FOP conformance

[Arved Sandstrom]

This was already a known thing, and Norman Walsh pointed it out also.   There is simply no point in fixing this until the FOP rewrite emerges.   Arved Sandstrom ----- Original Message ----- From: Carmelo Montanez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: FOP conformance Hi all:       Anyone aware of how  FOP 0.20.2 conforms to the latest XSL recommendations of October of this year?, I am writing some conformance tests for the latest specifications and FOP complains about   <fo:page-sequence master-reference = "some-master-reference">     .... </fo:page-sequence>   it complains about "master-reference", which used to be "master-name" on the previous version.   Thanks, Carmelo Montanez