I'm glad to see this will be getting done. I had thought of doing it, but I'm trying not to get distracted and to devote what little time I have (which is likely not to improve for the next two weeks unfortunately) to the new FOP. Since I'm going to be talking about XSL-FO at the XML 2001 conference in 10 days, I would have been a bit unhappy to admit that there is no version of FOP which handles the final XSL recommendation syntax.
I think there are a few bug fixes and table improvements in the current maintenance branch which I committed just after 0-20.2-RC was out, and which may help some FOP users. I've also seen some recent complaints about Fop's famous looping behavior when any object won't fit on the page, including a set of spanned table rows. I think it would at least be worthwhile trying to make a set of spanning rows breakable. If Arved, Christian or someone else could look at this, I'd be happy to give a few pointers. Regards, Karen Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > And between me and Christian I think we will see to it that this change, at > least, gets done and is reflected in a maintenance release, which I suggest > should appear NLT Dec 15. > > In other words, I accept your argument (that was never in question). It's a > resource thing...Keiron and Karen (and some others, such as Peter West) are > looking at the rewrite, so it's up to the rest of us to do stuff like this. > > AHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
