On 2002.03.18 12:45 Arved Sandstrom wrote: > So I don't disagree, although I'd get pedantic and point out that, yes, > we're setting _a_ size on the viewport, but that is not necessarily the > size of the image. But layout doesn't care - it only cares about the size > of > the viewport.
Yes there are the two different sizes, the image and the content size of the viewport. > Using the URL as a cache key clears other things up, too. Thanks. > > Is it safe to assume that when we refer to the "image" being in cache, > and > being retrieved from cache with the URL, etc etc, that _this_ image is > the > FopAbstractImage or an advanced version of same? Yes, an implementation of the FopImage interface to be precise. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
