Nothing is not yet submitted, due to circumstances at work.
I think I can send a part of it next week that gives aboute 30% faster fop.
Henrik
| "Venu Reddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2002-10-24 20:28
|
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Performance tuning. |
Hi,
What is the current status of this performance tuning.
Have the code changes been submitted and performance benefits
verified. I really could use some speed improvements with fop,
I have some very large reports 400/500 pages that are taking
5+ minutes to run.
Thanks,
Venu Reddy
P.S: I am willing to apply the code changes to my version
of fop(0.20.4), test it and submit the results on my large
fo files.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance tuning.
Henrik Olsson wrote:
> Hi.
> I have runned several performance tests on the FOP and and I have found
> out several bottle necks (especially in the PropertyListBuilder).
> Most things is about reducing gc and some others about not so well written
> code.
>
> The result of this tunings gives me a speed of 3 time faster than the
> original FOP.
WOW!!!
> So what do I do to get the code in to the fop-project (the problems are
> both in the fop 0.20.4 and in the DEV 1.0).
>
> I have also figured out some more thing but they are not so general but it
> makes the FOP as fast as a comersial tool written in C++ (StreamServe).
could you make your patched version available somewhere???
if you don't have a server, just send it to my private mail and i'll put it
in my home_dir at the
apache server ;-)
martin
>
>
> Henrik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
