W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
I agree that formally it's an error, but considering the current status quo I believe we can afford only a warning.In the meantime, the spec is plain on this point, so why not follow it?
Absolutely, we should follow the spec--that is the safest route. I was really just noting that, given the unique aspect of this one sequence group, XEP's validator was not entirely out of line for not enforcing it strictly. But it probably should issue a warning, at least. I'll submit that on the XEP support list.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
