> -----Original Message----- > From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Excellent idea. I've never used that fo tag (I'm sure there are many > I've never used! I should go take another look at the spec.). It could > be as simple as "if fo:title[.!=''] 'PrintJobName' = fo:title; else > 'PrintJobName'='FOP Document'" or something. It could also be toggled > with a arg/flag (defaulted to OFF for security reasons!). > > Michael Reiche wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:53, Clay Leeds wrote: > > > > Wouldn't content of <fo:title> be a logical source of information to > > append? > >
This remark had got me thinking, and is now responsible for my promised patch taking a bit longer than I first intended... I suppose one would want to have the option of selecting the type of printjob description from the command-line as well. Three options: - 'FOP Document' - 'FOP Document - ' + sourceXML/FO name - 'FOP Document - ' + <fo:title> Anyway, just realized this can wait. As the FOP Compliance page indicates this object to be unimplemented for the moment... (I *am* reading this right, not? ;)) So don't start relying on that tag just yet. Greetz, Andreas
