> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <snip /> > All in all I think that this change simplifies the code, and would be > a good change. > > Allow me to make some notes: > > 1. Would it not be a good idea to move Property.java from fo to > properties? >
A question that was on the tip of my tongue too... I'd think: not only Property.java, but all related Maker-classes as well. <snip /> > 3. Should ToBeImplemented.java also be removed? In the long run, that *should* be the objective indeed. For the moment, I'd leave that right where it is, until we're sure we've no more refs to it hidden somewhere else in the code. Cheers, Andreas
