--- "Andreas L. Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Pepping > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <snip /> > > All in all I think that this change simplifies the > code, and would be > > a good change. > > > > Allow me to make some notes: > > > > 1. Would it not be a good idea to move > Property.java from fo to > > properties? > > > > A question that was on the tip of my tongue too... > I'd think: not only > Property.java, but all related Maker-classes as > well. >
Another option, Finn, is to move all the Property subclasses to fo.properties (even if they're alongside the makers, nested or unnested), after thinking about it, I think that will be a little bit clearer than having them in the datatype package. Comments? Thanks, Glen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
