DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706 [PATCH] More justification problems ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-17 07:42 ------- Hi Simon, thanks for your additional comments. On your first point regarding trailing spaces, just to be clear, are you saying there shouldnt be trailing spaces according to the XSL-FO specification, or is this your opinion? Either way, you may be right, I just want to understand this problem from a specification point of view. After all there is a lot of talk about whitespace handling in the spec, and my understanding was that this is all dealt with in Block.handleWhiteSpace and so any whitespace left after that is intentional by the user, and by preserving it FOP is conforming with the spec. On your second point, I'm afraid I still dont follow completely. You are analysing the problem from a code perspective and seeing a possible flaw in the logic. I understand that, and your reasoning looks good. However, I am taking a step back and saying I do not see the word "spaces" disappearing. Dont forget that patch 28314 is applied to CVS, so if that patch is the cause of the word disappearing I'm a little puzzled why it doesnt disappear when I run the test. If you have a different test case, then please attach it. Is anyone else observing this anomaly? Chris
