I think, you are right. They should be abstract. On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote: > Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an abstract > class? Any reason why you made it instantiable--or > was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone know > why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract as > well? I might be missing something here...)
Jeremias Maerki
