I agree as well. Regards, Simon
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I think, you are right. They should be abstract. > > On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote: > > Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an abstract > > class? Any reason why you made it instantiable--or > > was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone know > > why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract as > > well? I might be missing something here...) > > > > Jeremias Maerki > -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
