-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 30, 2005, at 11:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
D'oh, right. :-) Lucky me.
Too bad, we don't generate validation warnings for misplaced
non-inherited properties. Didn't we have that discussion already this
year? I can't find it or am I imagining it?
I also remember this being mentioned... Yep, found it. A thread from
about a month ago.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=111962589510266&w=2
As Glen indicated, the XSL-FO Rec starts off by allowing any property
on any object, but further on, it does state that for every class of
objects there is a specific set of applicable properties.
Thinking of ideas on implementing such checks... Currently, I don't
think we already have a mapping of these object->applicable_props
anywhere, and maybe we don't even need such a map. Since the
PropertyList is a temporary list anyway, whose individual properties
get bound to member variables of the respective objects, is it safe to
say that the FObj subclass' member variables --or at least a subset--
corresponds to the set of applicable properties?
If that is true, what we're looking for seems to be a possibility to
check whether the list contains any unbound properties after the call
to --or ending-- FObj.bind().
Shouldn't cost too much, I think.
Cheers,
Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFC630myHTbFO9b8aARArkpAJ94BITEvZauAi+oMfRSpStvUPKTywCcCGgG
mMQvEojfDcJndutFEQtZatA=
=3Rdr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
