Hi Mark,
Mark C. Allman a écrit :
> Drop RTF with nothing to replace it, e.g., ODF? I'd rather not.
>
> Swap out RTF with, say, ODF? Sounds great to me.
>
> I'd even volunteer some time to help with development. I seem to
> remember something about Java.... ;-]
Thanks for your offer to help!
However... would that make sense to produce ODF from XSL-FO? There is no
semantic construction at all in FO, whereas there is some in ODF. The
other way around looks much more useful to me; as style informations are
stored using FO, this should be very easy to convert an ODF document
into plain XSL-FO.
Typically the transformation chain:
XML —> XSL-FO —+—> RTF
|
+—> PDF
would be replaced by:
XML —+—> XSL-FO —> PDF
|
+—> ODF
WDYT?
Vincent
