On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:11:34PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Clay, > > The Web Maestro wrote: > > I agree about consistency w requirements... Perhaps one additional > > release req 1.4, then move to 1.5 for the next release. I don't have > > any real energy about whether the 1.0 should be 1.4 or 1.5, however... > > I do agree that there should be a significant version change > > signalling the move from 1.4 to 1.5. Perhaps 0.96 (1.4) and 1.0 (1.5)? > > If FOP is going to switch anyway, is there a compelling reason not to > > req Java 1.6 instead of 1.5 for FOP 1.0 (or whatever version makes the > > jump)? Would that lock out a huge number of our audience? Would > > requiring 1.6 mean any significant performance or other benefit? > > According to this thread the majority seems to go along with releasing > a Java 1.4 compliant, 1.0 version. There would be a significant change
Agreed. > in the number of the following release, along with a jump to Java 1.5 as > a minimum requirement. That???s fine by me. Not agreed. There were two remarks about the version number. That part remains open. > I propose to launch the poll shortly after the release of 1.0. Very well. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
