Done. Simon
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:40:59PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:55:25AM +0000, Peter Hancock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When configuring the base directory using the fop.xconf relative urls > > are based on the working directory, and not the fop.xconf. > > This contradicts the URI specification as pointed out in > > http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Problem-with-custom-fonts-p10013042.html > > I hate it when applications show this bug. I was not aware that FOP > suffers from it. The problem must be solved as soon as possible. > > > Can anyone suggest a robust way of achieving this scenario, given the > > current limitations of FOP, or should I fix this bug? > > It would be wonderful if you can provide a fix. > > Simon
