Hi Simon, You beat me too it :-)
I can confirm it works for a simple case I was considering. Thanks! Peter On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simon Pepping <spepp...@leverkruid.eu> wrote: > Done. Simon > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:40:59PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:55:25AM +0000, Peter Hancock wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > When configuring the base directory using the fop.xconf relative urls >> > are based on the working directory, and not the fop.xconf. >> > This contradicts the URI specification as pointed out in >> > http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Problem-with-custom-fonts-p10013042.html >> >> I hate it when applications show this bug. I was not aware that FOP >> suffers from it. The problem must be solved as soon as possible. >> >> > Can anyone suggest a robust way of achieving this scenario, given the >> > current limitations of FOP, or should I fix this bug? >> >> It would be wonderful if you can provide a fix. >> >> Simon >
