https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #38 from Simon Pepping <spepp...@apache.org> 2011-06-22 18:31:13 UTC --- The code contains a number of Unicode properties, e.g. in util.CharUtilities and DevanagariScriptProcessor. It would be better if all Unicode properties would be collected in one class. Perhaps it is even possible to generate that class from the Unicode Database files. You already do that with class BidiClassUtils. This would make it much easier to update FOP to newer versions of Unicode. Some of the info in util.CharUtilities is also provided by Character.UnicodeBlock.of(int codePoint). Why do you not use Java's Unicode support or ICU? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
