On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> I also feel it is very important to continue using FOP documentation to > create *some* output format. I am not prepared to give up our dog food, > as that provides one more set of tests on FOP, that would otherwise be > missing. Given the sparseness of FOP test coverage, the more content we > formally run FOP on, the better. > s/FOP documentation/FOP processing/
