On Apr 8, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: > Yes, we'd lose the XML-based nature of the documentation. That's a fairly > large loss, but I don't know if that's a showstopper, considering the > benefits of having CMS-based documentation. > > What prevents you from using the existing xdoc format as source, then using > an XSLT to map to MD whence it can be imported into / processed by the CMS. > Or can you incorporate this translation process into the CMS?
Nothing prevents, but the goal is in this exercise is to minimize launch preparation time. ;-) If we continue to use xdoc, the CMS is skipped. It's certainly possible, but... Clay
