thanks, i'm good to go then, so you have my +1 On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Peter Hancock <peter.hanc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Glenn, > > I have just committed to Temp_RoundedCorners to address some of the > concerns raised. > > > My preference would be to provide both the CSS3 named properties and also > > writing system relative properties, giving the user the preference of > which > > to use. But I would suggest using the same pattern as CSS3 for property > > names for these latter: > > > > border-top-left-radius > > border-top-right-radius > > border-bottom-right-radius > > border-bottom-left-radius > > > > border-before-start-radius > > border-before-end-radius > > border-after-start-radius > > border-after-end-radius > > I have now implemented border properties of the form > border-before-start-radius, that take one or two values, in line with > the CSS3 recommendation. However, I have not been able as yet to > implement properties for the absolute properties > (border-top-left-radius, etc). I am unable to prove concretely that > the property resolution system can or cannot support my requirements > here, but either way I have decided to put this requirement on hold > for now. The omission of these properties will not affect backwards > compatibility going forward and so I do not personally consider it to > be a show stopper. > > > it would also be useful to support the border-radius shortcut from CSS3 > > (mapping to the above CSS3 longhand flavors) > This was done previously if we accept that the second value refers to > the block progression direction and not the absolute top-to-bottom > direction. > > I have updated the example fo and the CMS to reflect these changes. > > If you are happy with the change I can proceed with the merge. > > Thanks, > > Peter >
