> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abhijit Junnare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I tried replacing the inner fo:inline with fo:wrapper
> but the result is the same. The text is still lost.
> any more ideas?
>

I can't seem to reproduce this at first glance... Can you provide us with a
bit more context?

FYI:
appending your supplied block snippet to the simple.fo example file that
comes with FOP gave no problems at all with 0.20.5. (1.0-dev still had
problems with the small-caps and seems to swallow some text after a
linebreak...)


Cheers,

Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to