Hi, > It's neither a feature nor a bug. It's simply a gap in the > implementation IMO. It really depends on your requirements. If you only > have these obsolete fonts that FOP doesn't understand, it is surely > worth trying to fix this. You may simply have to determine how much work > it will be and if you (!) think it is worth it. We're certainly not > going to turn a fix like that down.
The problem is that the fonts are licensed : there are free to use but can't be modified :-( Otherwise, it could have been quite easy to reprocess them in a font utility and, at first, merge them :-) Remember also that Batik can handle them just because they considered several maps : http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-batik/sources/org/apache/batik/svggen/font/table/ Frommypoint of view, a good compromise would be to support SVG fonts in FOP... althought I find ths format quite limited. But... that'is another matter:-) Cheers, p.b. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
