Clay Leeds wrote:
<snip/>
I guess that's possible. It's also possible that whatever problem you're having is due to portions of fop-0.20.5 not yet in compliance with the spec (FOP is 'moving towards' the spec, but check the Compliance page[1] to (currently shows 'basic' compliance, but not 'extended' nor 'complete' compliance with force-page-count object).
Compliance is either Yes, No or Partial. The basic/extended/complete columns refer to which part of the spec that FO is categorised under. I know this has confused people before.
Nonetheless, trying every value for force-page-count might yield different/better results..
Alas, I feel that what Paul is trying to achieve may not be possible with XSL-FO.
Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
