And is there a workaround that I can use? Or am I forced to use another xslfo processor then the Apache FOP one? Might be a tricky question on this list, but what are the good alternatives for FOP? Gunter
"Pascal Sancho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 23-11-2004 13:39 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [fop] linefeed-treatment="preserve" doesn't preserve the linefeed Hi Gunter, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Gunter D'Hondt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Looking at the FAQ I think I don't do anything wrong in my > code coz I'm placing the attrbute > linefeed-treatment="preserve" into it. The attr > white-space-collapse I don't need or has nothing to do with > the linefeed (I assume). Linefeed-treatment and white-space-collapse are both set to "no" in the fop compliance chart ( see http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-linefeed-treatment ) > I understand that the linefeed-treatment attr is the one to > specify this but still something else must go wrong here. > And what is meant in the FAQ with: > "Due to a bug in current versions of FOP, setting > white-space-collapse="false" will also preserve line breaks > in the text. > Do not rely on this behavior, as it is non-conformant and > will be changed. > " > which "current versions" is that? 0.20.5? so this has nothing Yes > to do with > 0.20.4 which I'm using? > Any help is welcome, Pascal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
