Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
If it turns out that 0.93 is slower on any JVM, then if you can, please send us the FO, so we can investigate what might be causing this. Is there anything special about the FO-file? (i.e. lots of markers, images, tables, particular FO-constructs...)
FWIW we've noticed a similar issue with speed here, although in our case we were comparing the speed of 0.20.5 to 0.93 so we hadn't narrowed it down to being the very latest version. The only thing peculiar about our own FO files is that they are relatively heavy on table usage. and often have large images (>1024px) which are scaled down to a small size (~120px) for thumbnails.
Daniel -- Daniel Noll Nuix Pty Ltd Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699 Web: http://nuix.com/ Fax: +61 2 9212 6902 This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
