Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Apr 14, 2007, at 20:55, Thomas Zastrow wrote: > >> Andreas L Delmelle wrote: >>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote: >>> >>>> <snip /> >>>> The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the >>>> root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The base-tag in the >>>> config-file is untouched, it is still <base>.</base> >>> >>> Keep in mind that they are influenced by <font-base>. I /think/ both >>> of them. At least, I hope so... :/ >>> >> OK, I added <font-base>.</font-base> to the fop.xconf. But the result is >> the same ... btw., I'm not sure which directory is meant with "."? > > Errm, if I'm correct then the "." is to be interpreted as relative to > the source document... > In any case, now that you mention it, it does seem to lean towards bad > practice to use a relative url as base-url for anything... :/ > >> Is it the conf-directory? Or the root-directory? I copied both the >> metric xml >> file and the ttf-file also to conf, but FOP still can't find them. >> >> Is conf/fop.xconf read by default or have I to specify it as >> config-file? > > You have to specify it. The fop.xconf file contains the settings that > are used by FOP if no config file is specified, but the file itself is > not used unless you tell FOP to use it. If you leave it unchanged, and > start FOP with "-c conf/fop.xconf", then the result is the same as if > no config file has been used. > Andreas, again, thank you :-)
I solved the "problem": I used absolute paths, which is - in my oppinion - just a workaround :-) But now it works. Take a look at the "Using LinuxLibertine with the Apache FOP" on my examples page: http://www.thomas-zastrow.de/st/examples.php Best, Tom -- ---------------------------- http://www.thomas-zastrow.de German Forum - DTP under Linux: http://www.opendtp.de ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
