On 11 Apr 2008, at 17:48, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 07:18, Peter Coppens wrote:
Tried 2 more tiffs (but from the same 'source'). They gave the
similar results for relative performance. 1 (0.94) vs 30 (0.95beta)
vs 6(0.95beta-jeremias-tiff)
Given my non existent knowledge on tiff (and image formats in
general) and (I am sure recognizable) chronic lack of time to dive
into image formats at this moment, I am afraid I would not even
know with which tiff parameters to play
Which properties did you alter exactly? In the meantime, I read
somewhere that Apple's native TIFF codec for JAI does not provide
support for big-endian TIFFs.
None to be honest. Just took other tiff files. Would be nice if
someone could try to reproduce my findings on another platform with
other files. Perhaps this is a macos only issue...although the fact
that 0.94 is faster than 0.95beta-jeremias-tiff would make
that ....weird.
Cheers
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
