On May 8, 2008, at 14:52, paul womack wrote:
q1) May I assume that any particular version of FOP would be able
to consume an area tree (XML) that it had itself generated?
That's a reasonable assumption, I think.
(I have noted your other information; thank you)
This assumption may be reasonable, but it just failed
a test (I think)
generating tiff directly:
../fop -dpi 288 -xsl lineage.xsl -xml lineage_eg.xml -tiff a.tif
gives me different line breaks to going via an "at" file:
../fop -xsl lineage.xsl -xml lineage_eg.xml -at lineage.at.xml; ../
fop -atin lineage.at.xml -dpi 288 -tiff b.tif
Unless these are different for a "valid" reason that I am ignorant of?
I think the problem is that you have to specify the eventual renderer
to mimic.
Try
../fop -xsl lineage.xsl -xml lineage_eg.xml -at image/tiff
lineage.at.xml;
^^^^^^^^^^
HTH!
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
