You are indeed right, that works, thank you! For some reason it didn't occur to me to not include the page position attribute for the "all-but-last" layout.
Haven't retried the "only" page-position yet (I'm interested in confirming that this works.) Amick, Eric wrote: > > I'm probably missing something, but won't this do what you want? > > <fo:page-sequence-master master-name="letter"> > <fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > <fo:conditional-page-master-reference page-position="last" > master-reference="letter-last"/> > <fo:conditional-page-master-reference > master-reference="letter-all-but-last"/> > </fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> > </fo:page-sequence-master> > > Eric Amick Systems Engineer II > Legislative Computer Systems > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: FPar [mailto:francis.pars...@verizon.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:09 >> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> Subject: Re: FOP 1.0 support for 'page-postion=only' >> >> >> Hmm, OK. The compliance page seems to be for all versions. Do you have >> an >> example of something that should work? I have a letter where there is a >> signature section that should appear (in the footer) of the last page >> (I >> want to keep it fixed to the bottom to the page). However, if the page >> is >> only one page long, I also want that signature section to appear. >> >> This is what I had that didn't work: >> >> <fo:page-sequence-master master-name="letter"> >> <fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> >> <fo:conditional-page-master-reference page-position="only" >> master-reference="letter-last"/> >> <fo:conditional-page-master-reference page-position="first" >> master-reference="letter-all-but-last"/> >> <fo:conditional-page-master-reference page-position="rest" >> master-reference="letter-all-but-last"/> >> <fo:conditional-page-master-reference page-position="last" >> master-reference="letter-last"/> >> >> >> </fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives> >> </fo:page-sequence-master> >> >> Does this look correct? Should this work? Thanks for any help with >> this! >> >> >> >> Pascal Sancho wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Page compliance says that partial support concerns only FOP 0.95. >> Latter >> > versions have full support for this property. >> > >> > After SVN check, the "only" support was added in rev 698280, witch >> was >> > prior to FOP 1.0. >> > >> > So, page compliance is up to date (regarding that feature), and FOP >> 1.0 >> > should implement it fully. >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FOP-1.0-support- >> for-%27page-postion%3Donly%27-tp33188282p33194743.html >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FOP-1.0-support-for-%27page-postion%3Donly%27-tp33188282p33197090.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
