The original was certainly over-specified, but I would have expected it to work. Unless I've misunderstood, "only" is true only when "first" and "last" are both true, and "rest" is true only when neither "first" nor "last" is true, so putting "last" at the end should have been OK.
Eric Amick Systems Engineer II Legislative Computer Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: Pascal Sancho [mailto:pascal.san...@takoma.fr] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 3:42 > To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: FOP 1.0 support for 'page-postion=only' > > Hi, > > "only" works as expected. > > Note that fo:conditional-page-master-reference order is taken into > account within the fo:repeatable-page-master-alternatives. > (this is a sequential test). > > if you need a "only" master, you have to put it in 1st position, > otherwise another one can be used. > Same thing about "last" master, witch is probably more what you need in > this case.
