Hi all, I'm new to the list so please be kind ;)
I'm currently investigating an issue in our documentation tool chain based on DITA OT and FOP. The current FOP version used is FOP-0.94 in combination with batik-all-1.7 and xmlgraphics-commons-1.4. With this combination of versions everything is rendered correctly. In particular my SVGs and the fonts in the SVG file are displayed as expected (as rendered in the SVG Editor we use). I'm currently trying to upgrade the toolkit to use the latest FOP version (1.0) and everything is fine except for one thing. The fonts that are used in the SVG files are not displayed correctly. I attached two snapshots to illustrate what happens. I found out that already version 0.95 of FOP shows this problem. So in between 0.94 and 0.95 something must have changed that causes the issue. I'm very grateful for any hints that help solving this issue. For the time being we "can survive" with the older FOP version, but we I not very confident staying on this old version. For questions regarding the content/font types I have attached a sample SVG file as well. Thanks in advance... Best regards, Karsten PS: there is also a second issue with rendering the sample SVG file with regards to indentation of texts (some texts are rendered with an offset). This problem however exists with all used FOP version so far. But this not the main subject of this post. LICENSE NOTE: no license is granted to use any attachment of this post other than to help reproducing and solving the issues reported. Ownership and copyright stays with the original author of this post and or the original authors/providers of the files. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SVG-Font-Issue-between-FOP-0.94-and-FOP-1.0-tp33763437p33763437.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
