Hi Karsten,

Since you waited so long this is not a pressing issue, I suggest to download a 
nightly build snapshot of the current trunk [1] and check if this is fixed. In 
the next few months, there will be a new FOP release. If this is not already 
fixed, then a minimal input XSL:FO (in addition to the SVG) would help looking 
further into this.

[1] http://ci.apache.org/projects/xmlgraphics/fop/snapshots/

Alexios Giotis



On May 4, 2012, at 10:42 AM, karsten.klein wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm new to the list so please be kind ;)
> 
> I'm currently investigating an issue in our documentation tool chain based
> on DITA OT and FOP. The current FOP version used is FOP-0.94 in combination
> with batik-all-1.7 and xmlgraphics-commons-1.4. With this combination of
> versions everything is rendered correctly. In particular my SVGs and the
> fonts in the SVG file are displayed as expected (as rendered in the SVG
> Editor we use).
> 
> I'm currently trying to upgrade the toolkit to use the latest FOP version
> (1.0) and everything is fine except for one thing. The fonts that are used
> in the SVG files are not displayed correctly. I attached two snapshots to
> illustrate what happens.
> 
> I found out that already version 0.95 of FOP shows this problem. So in
> between 0.94 and 0.95 something must have changed that causes the issue.
> 
> I'm very grateful for any hints that help solving this issue. For the time
> being we "can survive" with the older FOP version, but we I not very
> confident staying on this old version.
> 
> For questions regarding the content/font types I have attached a sample SVG
> file as well.
> 
> Thanks in advance...
> 
> Best regards,
> Karsten
> 
> PS: there is also a second issue with rendering the sample SVG file with
> regards to indentation of texts (some texts are rendered with an offset).
> This problem however exists with all used FOP version so far. But this not
> the main subject of this post.
> 
> LICENSE NOTE: no license is granted to use any attachment of this post other
> than to help reproducing and solving the issues reported. Ownership and
> copyright stays with the original author of this post and or the original
> authors/providers of the files.
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/SVG-Font-Issue-between-FOP-0.94-and-FOP-1.0-tp33763437p33763437.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to