Helpful and in depth answer, Thanks Vincent
On May 4, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Alexios, > > On 03/05/12 17:23, Alexios Giotis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed a difference to the way the <font-base> works in FOP configuration >> file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0, relative paths (for example >> <font-base>src/test/data/fonts</font-base>) are resolved against the current >> working directory (of the java process), while in trunk relative paths are >> resolved against the location of the fop.xconf file. >> >> Is it a bug or is this intentional ? In the latter case, what are the >> reasons for this change ? > > This is intentional and actually fixes the buggy previous behaviour. > A relative URI should be resolved against the URI of the containing > document, not the current directory in which the process is running. > > See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?revision=1058945&view=revision > See also section 5.1 of the URI RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt > > >> Alex Giotis > > HTH, > Vincent > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
