Just a brief update on this thread.
I have installed pulp 2.10.0-0.4.beta.el7 on a clean development
environment and have run both the runcible and katello test suites.
The results were:
runcible: 252 tests, 632 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 3 skips
katello: 1832 runs, 4448 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 8 skips
I plan to run manual tests with katello, but so far it is looking good.
That said, we'll want/need to run through them again once pulp 2.10 is
no longer in beta.
thanks,
Brad
On 08/24/2016 05:33 PM, Tom McKay wrote:
Katello and foreman are nearing dev freeze in early September but
there are a few features centered around Atomic Host and Atomic
Registry that will need changes introduced in pulp-2.10. While I
understand pulp-2.10 is currently still in beta, I was hoping we could
bring it into katello now ahead of dev freeze so the dependent
integration could be completed.
If we did bring in pulp-2.10, it would have to be with the
understanding that breakages on both sides would need to be fixed
prior to katello releasing. I know this is usually how things go
anyways but I just wanted to state it up front.
Also, are there resources to do this work? If I understand things
correctly, it's not just as simple as updating a repo file to point to
pulp-2.10, but that changes to runcible would also need to be made? Is
this something that could be done ASAP? Sooner means more time to
shake out issues.
Thoughts?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
