On pondělí 14. srpna 2017 17:31:00 CEST Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This went fairly quiet, but we all seem largely in agreement. I'll
> draft something up for the website and send a PR tomorrow. I had a few
> side questions though:
> 
> On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 10:13 +0200, Marek Hulán wrote:
> > In general +1. I'm not sure if official policy changes anything,
> > probably does not do any harm either
> 
> Indeed, and helps us to remember to add maintainers when bringing a
> plugin into the GitHub org.
> 
> > It would be great if someone went over all plugins under theforeman
> > org on github, found projects with single owner and ask the owner to
> > extend the list. Or someone scritped a simple check so we would
> > avoid  this situation in future. I think what Dmitri described
> > is fair and should become a common practice for new repos/gems in our
> > org.
> 
> Is there a way to view that info on Rubygems? I can't see it on the gem
> pages themselves, is there an API I've missed?

I can see it on gem page, e.g. at https://rubygems.org/gems/foreman_chef 
search for OWNERS. There's just me. This is how to get this info through curl

curl https://rubygems.org/api/v1/gems/foreman_chef/owners.json

see http://guides.rubygems.org/rubygems-org-api/#owner-methods for more 
details.

--
Marek

> 
> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 16:28 +0200, Daniel Lobato Garcia wrote:
> > +1 to this, I am stuck with foreman-docker where I want to give
> > publish
> 
> What's blocking you? Who owns the gem?
> 
> Regards
> Greg


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to