Maybe so. If people don't want to have their mail mistaken for phishing
attacks they should avoid writing it to look like one. Things like "to confirm
this is not spam" are utterly meaningless. A "forms.gle" URL I have only seen
in fraudulent emails; ditto google/forms URLs. And in particular, a message
signed "Fellow Developer" is not one I'm ever going to believe.
paul
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Arjen Markus <arjen.markus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am not sure that your diagnosis is correct: the survey was announcement by
> Stack Overflow. See https:// stackoverflow.blog/ 2021/ 05/
> 25/the-2021-developer-survey-is-now-open/
> ?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_overflow_newsletter
> (to avoid an embedded link just in case, I have added spaces after the
> slashes)
>
> Op wo 2 jun. 2021 om 15:08 schreef Paul Koning via Fortran
> <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>:
> That sure looks like a phishing attack. The .gle link is a major red flag.
> I'm not going there and I would recommend everyone else avoid it too.
>
> paul
>
> > On Jun 1, 2021, at 11:02 PM, Dev Survey via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> > I have attached a survey form so that I can better understand what kind of
> > tools developers like to have to facilitate their workflows on a day to day
> > basis.
> > No login required or identifiable information collection and is a
> > completely anonymous survey, and takes no more than 5-10 minutes.
> > Developer Tools Survey
> >
> > To confirm this is not spam, please check via : https://www.phishtank.com/
> > Shortened URL : https://forms.gle/vTrFNUhfFcqznSRr9
> > Full URL :
> > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSePzAwRUsem1wunWWtXr_FoX2viruIfoyb744zGufX5jBxH8A/viewform?usp=sf_link
> > Thanks,Fellow Developer
>
